Revised Conclusion

In the post below, I will be revising my conclusion and focusing on answering the question of "so what." My revision provides more examples and explanations. In addition, it thoroughly explains why the author created her article. The revision summarizes every paragraph as well as ties it back into how the author constructed her argument, which is the goal of project two. 

John Talbot. "Ella the Snow Dog." November 30, 2008 via Flickr. Public Domain Dedication.

Original: Parry utilizes logical rhetorical strategies to effectively present her argument. By including knowledge from experts, using logical organization and repeating specific words, Parry is able to construct an effective argument against embryonic engineering. We can identify the author's view; through her rhetoric strategies, we can clearly identify how she constructs her argument. Because of this, her article is effective and causes the reader to have an ethical awareness for issues involved in embryonic engineering.

Revision: Parry utilizes logical rhetorical strategies to effectively present her argument. By including knowledge from experts, she is able to support her argument against embryonic engineering with credible information. Because of this, Parry appeals to the logic of her readers. Parry utilizes rhetorical questions to force the audience to consider personal views as well as Parry’s views presented in her article. Finally, she implements logical organization that allow her readers to follow her argument. Parry repeats specific words like “uncertain”, “ban” and “mother nature” and is able to present her argument subconsciously in order to effectively cause the reader to consider ethical issues involved in embryonic engineering. Through these specific logical strategies, Parry constructs an effective argument to appeal to her audience and evoke a sense of ethical awareness within each reader.